078. SATANIC VERSE Does Muhammad bowed to pagans and blamed Iblis for it?

  

The Satanic Verses
- Muhammad's worst mistake
- Shiekh al Dabari = The Quraysh
- Muhammad received a revelation praising goddesses Alat, Aluza and Manat.

" Have you considered Al-at and la-Uzza and Manat the third, the other? These area exalted cranes whose intercession is to be hoped for."

- Muhammad finally recognized their gods.
- Later, Muhammad claimed that these verses are not from God, but from Shaitan. He said Satan had whispered these into his mouth without realizing it.

- The revelation was retracted. New verses replaced the old ones, replacing these pagan deities. Today the edited version in the Quran Surah 53, but the exalted cranes part is gone. 

- This called the Satanic Verses incident. This is far from embarrassment.

- Doctrine of abrogation, the idea that false revelations could be cancelled can be replaced by "true" ones.

- Solution created a greter problem. If Muhammad is tasught to be the final infallible messenger, could be deceived by Satan even once. How can we believe that the other parts of the Quran can be tampered with?

- Where do this deception end?

- Islam is the unchangeable word of God, perfect nd preserved. Yet the satanic verses shows that Muhammad himself admitted delivering a false rvelation. This directly contradict the Quran's claim Surah 15:9 where " Indeed, it is We who sent down the Quran and indeed, we will be its guardian."

- That means the entire foundation of Islam is already collapse. Most muslim leaders and apologists go to extreme lengths to hide or deny the Satanic Verse Incident. they claim the story is a fabrication, a lie invented by enemies of Islam.

- Some argue that it is weak or its not authentic, pointing to later Islamic scholars who tried to clean up earlier reports. 

- The problem: same story appeared in multiple early Islamic sources, not in Jewish or Christian writings, but in their own respectful histories. 

- Ibn Ishak's biogra-hy of Muhammad, Al dabari's accounts, and even fragments from Al Wakiri, all include this. All these historians are trusted to compile the life of Muhammad and early Islam.

- Muslims accept these historians glorifying Muhammad's battles or his supposed miracles. But the moment their record show something damaging, suddenly those same historians become unreliable. It is called selective outrage. It is a desperate attempt to PROTECT AN IMAGE, not to seek the TRUTH.

- If early Muslims didn't hide the truth, Why not modern Muslims?

- Truth doesn't need cover ups. But falsehoods aleways does. 

- What kind of prophet deliver words from Satan and then claims to correct it afterward?

== In Bible: true prophets were never never deceived into speaking for false gods. Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, they boldly confronted idolatry, not accidentally promote it. Meanwhile Muhammad admitted the Satan slipped words into his mouth. Even if he later corrected it, the damage was done. He had mixed the words of darkness with the words of GOD.

Does the messenger be fooled into praising pagan idols? Would the all powerful, holy god Abraham allow his final prophet to fall for Satan's deception and lead others astray, even for a moment?

If Muhammad could be tricked once, how can anyone guarantee it didn't happen again? 

Towards Jesus, "Sam Shamoun FULLY ANSWERS Islam's MOST Common QUESTIONS & ATTACKS To Christianity", Youtube, Mar 9 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eFVMLtLIWE&t=109s